Dec 16 Event: Mongolia FAQ

Mongolia Lecture Series
Program on Inner Asia
Institute of Asian Research
UBC

A Panel Presentation

FAQ Mongolia: Some Answers to the Most Frequently Asked Questions on (Mining) Policy

Friday, December 16, 2011
16-18h
UBC Robson Square
Room C.485

Supported by

The event is free and open to the public.

Mongolia has been hailed as the next mining investment Eldorado at several moments over the past decade. Much of the current interest is linked to the Oyu Tolgoi gold/copper project and the bidding for Tavan Tolgoi, a large coal project. While international investors explore opportunities in Mongolia, Mongolians grapple with the implications of a mining boom. Beyond the immediate economic implications, a mining boom will bring rapid and far-reaching ecological and social change to Mongolia. Members of our panel will present observations on contemporary Mongolia rooted in on-going research and consulting projects.

Some of the questions we will address will be:

  • The Mongolian government wants to overcome charges of corruption. How can governance be improved?

Hon. Jim Abbott PC
Parliamentary Secretary to the Minister of International Cooperation (retired)

  • How is the mining boom affecting the macroeconomic stability and competitiveness of Mongolia?

Dr. N. Bolor
Freelance Consultant, Toronto, Canada
Formerly Associate Professor, National University of Mongolia and Policy Analyst, Mongolian National Mining Association

  • How have recent policy shifts in Mongolia shaped environmental management in the mining sector?

Kirsten Dales
MSc Candidate, Master in Environmental Management
Royal Roads University

  • What role are environmental movements playing in Mongolia’s civil society?

D. Byambajav
PhD Candidate, Sociology
Hokkaido University, Japan

  • How is China viewed in Mongolia?

J. Mendee
MA Asia Pacific Policy Studies
MA Candidate, Political Science
UBC

  • How stable is Mongolian democracy? What likelihood is there for radical change in the political context of economic development?

Dr. Julian Dierkes
Associate Professor and Coordinator, Program on Inner Asia
UBC

Posted in Canada, Democracy, Events, FAQ Mongolia Dec 16 2011, Mining, Politics, Social Issues | 5 Comments

Jean-Frédéric Légaré-Tremblay on How Mining Activities are Testing Mongolia’s Sovereignty

Jean-Frédéric Légaré-Tremblay is a Canadian journalist who frequently writes on international affairs for Le Devoir and l’Actualité. In October 2011 he spent three weeks in Mongolia thanks to a Bourse Nord-Sud granted by the Fédération professionnelle des journalistes du Québec. The following article was originally published on OpenCanada.org, the site of the Canadian International Council.

Genghis Khan Keeps an Eye on His Riches

November 30, 2011

About an hour’s drive from Ulan Bator, Mongolia’s capital, a massive statue of Genghis Khan in shining armour emerges out of the steppe. Sitting straight on his horse at 141 feet, he looks defiantly at the horizon, wrapped in his brand-new 250-ton stainless-steel coat. Banned from the country, as any other nationalistic symbol was during the communist era that ended with the collapse of the Soviet Union, the cruel conqueror of the 13th century, who claims the fatherhood of the largest empire ever built on Earth, is now back in the Asian steppes – with a vengeance.

“It’s him who united all the Mongolians and built our country,” a Mongolian woman in her 50s wearing a blue silk del – the traditional costume – said from the observatory, standing atop the head of Khan’s mounting. “But we need, today, a new Genghis Khan to make Mongolia stronger, and to give us back our riches!”

As Mongolia experiences one of the fastest rates of economic growth in the world, driven by a massive mining boom and intake of foreign investments, the country, sandwiched between Russia and China, also experiences a wave of fierce nationalism that increasingly sees the exploitation of natural resources by foreign companies as a looting of its almost sacred riches. But the “looters” are now not only Chinese or Russian, as they have been for decades – they’re Canadian, too. Canada now ranks second after China in Mongolia for foreign investments but ranks first in the booming sector of natural resources (e.g. mining). It’s no wonder Canadian companies have felt the heat and will probably still do so in years to come.


The Roaring Mongolian Economy

It’s not rare anymore to hear that Mongolia, already one of the fastest growing economies in the world, could become the fastest soon. 2011 started with 6.1 percent growth, followed by 17.3 during the second quarter and 20.8 percent during the next. The International Monetary Fund forecasts a 11.5 percent growth rate for the whole year, close to 12 percent next year… and close to 16 percent in 2016 .


In his brand new monster house, harboured in one of the few gated communities – which have developed only recently in Ulan Bator as a feature of its unbridled development – a 53-year-old businessman recognizes that he owes his success and his three-storey house to the mining boom. “But we don’t need all these foreign investments,” says the father of two, who built his fortune selling Lexus and furs. “Genghis Khan gave us all these incredible riches. And there might be even more to discover. We have always been rich […]. But it’s the foreign companies that are benefiting from it. Not us.”

The man went on to speak in Mongolian about Oyu Tolgoi, saying that it was a test of sovereignty for his country (as his 18-year-old son translated into perfect English). Oyu Tolgoi, or “Turquoise Hill” – is the talk of the town. It is Mongolia’s biggest mining project and economic and political issue No. 1. It is also the flagship project of Vancouver’s Ivanhoe Mines, which owns 66 per cent (in partnership with Rio Tinto) of what will be one of the largest copper-gold mines in the world when the site goes online in late 2012. The Mongolian government owns the remaining shares. The $6-billion project – roughly the size of Mongolia’s GDP – should produce a third of the country’s GDP when it reaches its full capacity by the end of the decade.

But why is it a test of sovereignty? Because, when the businessman was speaking in the early days of October, the Minister of Mines had just declared that he wanted to reopen the deal that was closed in 2009 after six years of intense negotiations with Ivanhoe, and raise the government’s shares to 50 per cent. The minister’s declaration sent a shockwave across the world markets, and caused dismay among foreign investors, who fear the rise of resources and economic nationalism.

Even though the government finally backed down two weeks later, the roots of that nationalism have not disappeared. Far from it, since they seem to be deeply rooted in a national pride that longs to be uttered after four long centuries of direct and indirect rule by either the Chinese or the Russians. The ubiquity of Genghis Khan – whose name and face now appear on the national airport’s main terminal, on a big hotel façade, on top of Parliament’s front steps, on vodka and beer bottles, and on a hill bordering Ulan Bator, to name a few – is only the most visible expression of that reclaimed pride.

This sentiment is deeply rooted in the steppes, the mountains, and even the dryness of the Gobi desert that shape the beloved land roamed in every corner by the nomads. Nature is revered in the least-densely populated country of the world, and it has to be taken care of – a popular and strong injunction that basically clashes with mining. Rare are the citizens of Ulan Bator, where half of the 2.8 million Mongolians now live, who don’t dream from time to time of going (or actually go) back to the countryside.

Forty-two-year-old Batsetseg comes from the steppe every now and then to lend a hand in a modest restaurant in Ulan Bator. Her sister opened the restaurant a year ago, and named it “Meej Mountain,” after a hill near their homeland that they hold dear. “When I’m in town, it’s for making money and helping my sister. I really miss the steppe, though …” she says in a very affectionate way. “But back near Erdenet [a mining city 325 km North of Ulan Bator], I worry because of the mine,” she goes on to say even before being asked about the mining activity. “We are a people who respect the environment. Our parents taught us not to cut the flowers and the trees. To dig the earth makes me uncomfortable. If we are to do mining, we have to do it gently and restore the land exactly as it was before, or [make it] even better. Otherwise, nature will take its revenge.”

For Batsetseg, it is no coincidence that the mining boom started about a decade ago and since then, the harsh winters – called dzud – have killed millions of livestock.

There seem to be few Mongolians who are strictly against mining. But they all want to think that the exploitation of their natural resources will benefit them in the long run. To enforce that hope, this fall, the government started sending a cheque of 21,000 tugriks (CAD$17) to every citizen in the country each month, and will soon be distributing 10 per cent of the shares of the Tavan Tolgoi project, which will be the largest coking coal mine in the world, evenly among Mongolians.

Despite these cash handouts, many people from the poor and middle classes feel that they have yet to see the benefits of the mining boom. In the meantime, they have to cope with galloping inflation that rides alongside unbridled economic growth. Last year, Mongolians were hit by a 10.1-per-cent rate for consumer goods, one of the three highest in Asia. This year, the International Monetary Fund expects it to double to 20 per cent.

All this fuels a nationalistic sentiment among the population that fuels, in turn, the equally strong stream of populism among elected officials. This is all too salient as the country is heading towards legislative elections in 2012.

The government seems to suffer from a split-personality disorder, trying to woo foreign investors and please a growingly nationalistic population at the same time. That Mongolia wants to attract capital from abroad is a no brainer. For one, Prime Minister Sukhbaatar Batbold is a forceful voice in favour of attracting foreign investors – including Canadian ones. The country also has a “third neighbour policy” – somewhat similar to Pierre Trudeau’s “third option” – which aims to diversify Mongolia’s diplomatic and economic ties away from its two obtrusive neighbours and towards other countries, including Canada.

Nevertheless, in October, nationalism mixed with populism pushed politicians in power to try to revise, to its advantage, the biggest commercial deal signed in Mongolia since the country switched to a free-market economy.

As the nationalistic sentiment grows among the population, and with election season well underway, ignoring politics and the interests of Mongolians could come at a heavy price for Canadian and other foreign companies.

Posted in Canada, Media and Press, Mining, Social Issues | 1 Comment

Visiting PhD Student at UBC: Sodnom DOLJIN

S DOLJIN arrived in Vancouver this week to spend a year here at UBC as a visiting scholar at the Centre for Asian Legal Studies.

Doljin is a PhD student in Law at Soongsil Univ in South Korea. While here at UBC, she will be continuing the work on her dissertation which is focused on international arbitration and dispute resolution. The on-going negotiations for a Foreign Investment Protection Agreement (FIPA) between Canada and Mongolia make this topic particularly interesting.

I hope that we’ll see her regularly here at the Institute of Asian Research and perhaps get her to contribute to this blog as well.

 

Posted in International Agreements, Law, Mining, Mongolia and ... | Leave a comment

Mongolia Studies Centre at ANU

It appears that the Australian National Univ. has set up a Mongolian Studies Centre. You know that I’m jealous, but terrific to see this level of institutionalization of attention to Mongolia. The centre is headed up by Li Narangoa. I’ve long been aware of her work on Mongolia (and also Japan, a kindred spirit), but no less about some of the other people involved in the centre.

I wish the colleagues at ANU all the best and hope that some day we might be able to create something similar at UBC.

 

 

Posted in Research on Mongolia | Tagged | Leave a comment

Call for Papers for “Progress and Integration in Desert Research”

Our colleague Troy Sternberg at Oxford University sent us Call for Papers for the 2nd Oxford Interdisciplinary Conference. 29-30 March 2012
School of Geography and the Environment, University of Oxford.

Posted in Conferences | Tagged | Leave a comment

Dalai Lama on Surprise Visit to Mongolia

By Julian Dierkes

His Holiness the Dalai Lama is on a surprise visit to Ulaanbaatar.

Sukhbaatar Sq Billboard to Welcome the Dalai Lama (Sue Byrne)

He has arrived directly from Japan and clearly he had been issued a visa to visit, though this was not announced in advance. The last time, the Daila Lama visited Mongolia was in 2006. When the Dalai Lama visited Mongolia in 2002, the Chinese government reacted by interrupting traffic on the Transsiberian Railroad.

The fact that the Mongolian government has decided to take a stance by issuing a visa for the visit (in contrast to the recent decision of the South African government, for example, a government to whom most observers would attribute more clout than to the Mongolian government which has to live with China as its Southern neighbour after all). Surely, this stance will lead to an immediate tongue lashing by the Chinese government and possibly more serious consequences in the coming days.

The Dalai Lama is holding public teachings, and one which is taking place in the Sports Palace that has been constructed with Chinese funding. He will also be meeting Mongolian government officials at a reception, though they will simply happen to be at this reception, not meeting His Holiness specifically.

This visit is also associated with another important event in the Mongolian Buddhist community. On November 2,2011, the 9th Bogd Javzandamba Hutagt was enthroned in Ulaanbaatar as the head of Gandantegchenlin monastery – the Center for Mongolian Buddhists, the largest monastery in Mongolia. The previous 8th Bogd Javzandamba was known as the Bogd Khan and ruled Mongolia from 1911 (independence from China) until the socialist revolution. The position of Bodg Khan was abolished in 1924 and the Republic of Mongolia was declared a secular state.

The 9th Bogd was born in Tibet in 1932. He was identified as the incarnation of the 8th Bogd when he was 4 years old. In 1961, he feld to India. The Dalai Lama formally approved him as the incarnation of the 8th Bogd in 1992. In 2010, he obtained Mongolian citizenship.

His enthronement prompted wide public attention in Mongolia. Some opposition from within the Mongolian Buddhist community criticized the Gandantegchenlin Monastery for not consulting with other head lamas of Buddhist monasteries and a group of head lamas or hambas has filed a lawsuit against the former head of Gandantegchenlin Monastery.

See also, Chris Devonshire-Ellis’ article, “Mongolia Enthrones its Dalai Lama“.

(With contributions from T. Shakya and Byambajav D.)

Posted in China, Dalai Lama, Mongolia and ..., Religion, Research on Mongolia | 1 Comment

Toronto Occupied by High-End Ger

An article in the Toronto Star has reported that some of the Occupy Toronto protesters have taken up residence in a beautiful, ornate yurt. While the article identifies this as an “insulated felt huts favoured by Turkic nomads in Kyrgyzstan and Kazakhstan”, the shape is more reminiscent of the Mongolian ger, than the more pointy version used by Kazakhs, including Kazakhs in Mongolia.

Debra Rasmussen of Agriteam first alerted me to this report. Deb is also an accomplished jazz singer, of course, who has long been involved with the Giant Steppes of Jazz festival and sings with the Northern Lights Quartet.

Posted in Curios | Tagged | 1 Comment

Korea, the United States, and Strategic Relations: Mongolia

An Oct 6, 2011 event at the Korea Society explored relations between Mongolia, Korea, and the United States.

Participants included Christopher Atwood, Associate Professor from the Central Eurasian Studies Department of Indiana University, The Korea Society’s Ambassador Mark Minton (U.S. Ambassador to Mongolia, 2006-2009), and Dr. Stephen Noerper (Visiting Professor, National University of Mongolia, The Asia Foundation Resident Representative, 2000-2003). They explore opportunities for business and foreign relations among the three players.

Korea, the United States, and Strategic Relations: Mongolia from The Korea Society on Vimeo.

For more information: koreasociety.org/​policy/​policy/​korea_the_united_states_and_strategic_relations_mongolia.html

Posted in International Relations, Mongolia and ..., Politics, South Korea | Tagged | Leave a comment

Election Law for Whom?

The revision of the Ikh Khural Election Law has been one of the vexing political issues in recent years.

The July 1st riot in 2008, which occurred after the Ikh Khural election and took the lives of five innocent people and injured hundreds, made the issue more urgent. The current session of the Ikh Khural is expected to make some vital changes, but party rivalries and MPs’ self-interests are posing a major constraint.

According to the Constitution of Mongolia, the Ikh Khural must not amend the Ikh Khural Election Law within six months before the upcoming election, so time is running out now for the summer 2012 election.

This may lead to a very similar situation as we saw in 2007 when the Ikh Khural waited until the last moment to amend the Election Law and chose the majoritarian multiple members system even though politicians had shown a notable degree of consensus over changing the majoritarian election system by introducing proportional-representation methods.

If you remember, it was one of the five pririorities of the government identified by S. Bayar, who was appointed as PM in November, 2007. Leading members of the Democratic Party, such as E. Bat-Uul, were active proponents for proportional-representative system at that time. Small political parties, such as the Civil Will Party, and newly formed “citizens’ movement” parties were apparently desperate and supported the change.

On December 4, 2007, seven MPs from four different parties submitted a draft Election Law to the Ikh Khural. The draft law proposed a proportional-representation system with a single electoral district, a list of party and independent candidates, and a five percent minimum threshold. But the change didn’t happen.

As the election was approaching, the two dominant political parties in Mongolia didn’t dare to change the rules of the game. Especially Democratic Party leaders became reluctant to introduce the proportional-representation system because they seemed to see S. Bayar’s MPRP as the potential winner if the upcoming election was held under the new system. At the same time, international donors and domestic civil society were pushing the MPRP and DP toward the adoption of the proportianal-representation system.

UNDP had, for example, a national program for assisting Mongolia to improve the electoral legislation and its major part was the re-examination of the existing election system. A number of conferences and national symposiums on election law change, comparative studies, study tours by MPs, and lectures by foreign experts had been organized, and there was much public expectation for positive change. However, two political parties stuck to the majoritarian system and made some unexpected changes at the last moment, such as removing the 30 percent gender quota provision from the election law. Ultimatelly, political party elites’ interests prevailed.

The majoritarian election system has consolidated two major political parties in Mongolia since 1992 (Duverger’s Law). Conversely, we also see how the parties have defined the election systems (Duverger’s Law Upside Down). Now, for example, the People’s Party of Mongolia (MPP), the former MPRP, is fighting to stick to the current majoritarian system.

Although there are on-going negotiations between the People’s Party and the Democratic party over the ratio of the Ikh Khural seats that would be decided by the majoritarian and proportional-representation systems, the final decision is going to depend on MPs and party leaders’ interests and strategies.

The People’s Party faces a strong challenge from its former chairman and the ex-president of Mongolia, N. Enkhbayar, who managed to register a new political party by usurping an 80-years old brand name – MPRP. The proportional-representation system also increases risks for less well-known MPs at the national level and MPs representing rural ridings.

The latest ratio between proportional and majoritarian election systems proposed by the People’s Party is 28:48. The negotiation and final decisions on the election system will  shape some crucial issues, such as the participation of Mongolian citizens living overseas, the gender quota of party candidates, and the alteration of electoral districts. Today, the Mongolian public expects fairness, inclusion, and legality from elections, and MPs and political party leaders are obliged to answer.

Posted in Democracy, Elections, Gender, Party Politics, Politics | Tagged | 1 Comment

A Good Day in Mongolia

Today, October 14, 2011, Mongolians are very busy. It is the 17th day of the second month of autumn, an auspicious day in Mongolia’s Buddhist calendar. We call it the day with Baljinnyam and Dashnyam (Buddhist deities) or a double-Nyam day. It has a strong symbolic meaning among Mongolians that this auspicious day will bring good things: happiness, wealth, and prosperity. Many things ranging from a multimillion dollar agreement to political party meetings to haircuts may be scheduled this day (OT Agreement was signed on the same 17th day, which was October 6, 2009). My friend in Mongolia is having his daughter’s haircut ceremony (feast), today. 128 couples will wed at the Ulaanbaatar’s Wedding Palace today starting from 01.40 am until 22.00 pm, which means each couple will have less than half an hour. A happy day for all.

Posted in Society and Culture | Tagged | Leave a comment

Changes in Ulaanbaatar’s Cityscape

By Julian Dierkes

One of the delights of returning to a city on a regular basis but at somewhat lengthy intervals (I’ve been traveling to Ulaanbaatar once or twice a year for the past seven years) is that gives the observer an opportunity to notice changes in the cityscape.

There was lots to notice on my most recent, August 2011, visit.

To anyone who is familiar with the (East) German Ampelmännchen it might not come as a surprise that the intersection at the SW corner of Sukhbaatar Sq now boasts traffic lights with an archer, wrestler, and horseback rider as the traffic light symbols. Terrific!

Not only have the traffic lights been changed, but some of the one-way rules on the W side of the square have also changed and traffic seems to be flowing a bit smoother now. Hard to tell as it was still summer and thus a lot of Ulaanbaatar residents in the countryside, but traffic seemed marginally lighter than during my last visit in January 2011.

The other most significant traffic and building project is probably the additional bridge over the Tuul which should ease N-S traffic a bit.

I used to think that Mongolia was where Hyundai Accents went to die, but they are not as dominant in traffic as they used to be. Generally, a greater mix of cars around. Some of the city buses are now a mobile WiFi hot spot.

More and more (small) parks seem to be appearing in downtown Ulaanbaatar. The park in front of the Central Tower looks quite manicured, including a water feature, at least in summer. Likewise the centre of the street leading straight North for the State Department Store has received a facelift and now looks quite attractive.

With some small parks springing up, fancy buildings are not far behind. The new MPP headquarters looks bombastic and almost finished. The DP will surely follow suite and construction is already under way on its sight next to the state opera, overlooking Sukhbaatar Sq.

Posted in Change, Ulaanbaatar | Tagged | 1 Comment

Mongolia Connected

According to the 2010 Mongolia Census, 30.6% of Mongolians (six years old and older) use the Internet. The level of Internet usage is higher in Ulaanbaatar (49.3%) and some urban centers, such as Erdenet (36.5%) and Darkhan (34.4%). A wide digital gap appears to exist particularly between Mongolia’s far western provinces and Ulaanbaatar as only about 10% of far western residents use the Internet. The usage of internet is urban-centric, but it is growing and diversifying.

Nowadays, some cellphone network operators provide inexpensive access to Internet (at least using messenger and email services) in Mongolia. The usage of cellphones is increasing dramatically. 74% of Mongolians (including children) and 86.9% of the residents of Ulaanbaatar have at least one cellphone. Two years ago, one could find a “street-phone” or a portable telephone, which all small kiosks and street vendors had everywhere in Ulaanbaatar. Now, they have disappeared.

Obviously, the increasing usage of Internet and cell phones has many important implications for everyday life, politics, and business. Broadly, it makes a landlocked country “land-linked,” and its people more connected. The map that you see below shows an interesting pattern. It obviously shows the expansion of Facebook, but it in part shows a difference between Mongolia and its immediate neighbors.

World Map of Social Networks

Posted in Population, Society and Culture, Ulaanbaatar | Tagged | Leave a comment

All is well in Mongolia?

By Julian Dierkes

After the recent flurry of reporting (Economist I, Economist II, National Post, Globe & Mail, The Northern Miner, The Financial Times, The Australian, on the electionineering sparring match between some Mongolian MPs and, who?, Ivanhoe?, the current government? China? some writers (Peter Koven for the National Post, Brenda Mouw for the Globe & Mail) are now giving the all clear because the Government of Mongolia has released a joint statement with Ivanhoe and Rio Tinto reaffirming support for the 2009 Investment Agreement.

This “all clear” is appropriate, but also comes a bit too quickly in my view.

Yes, All Clear!

Yes, negotiations over the Investment Agreement are not being reopened, but that’s not much of a surprise. A succession of governments in Mongolia have fought for and supported a comprehensive agreement with the foreign investors who are making development of the OT project possible in a way that would not be imaginable through domestic efforts alone (technological as well as financial hurdles). I emphasize governments to mean the executive, i.e. the president and cabinet, not members of the Ikh Khural.

Because there was a petition and it was addressed (though I wonder what exactly any discussions may have consisted of other than recognizing that IVN and RT responded, “No way are we re-negotiating at this point!”), this should quell some of the agitation among MPs.

Namely, if my analyses are right that a) this is primarily an election issues, and b) we will not see the emergence of a stable anti- or pro-mining political movement, then this means that there should be no formal attempts to revisit this issue, at least until this current government including its coalition arrangement fall, or the election, possibly even the presidential election in 2013.

Hang on a Second!

The underlying issue hasn’t gone away and we’re likely to see agitation on this issue – namely how to structure resource development so that it satisfies social demands for equitable and sustainable development – for years to come. We saw lots of discussions, including some grandstanding and nationalism, but also some very reasonable attempts to come to sensible solutions, for the five years leading up to the OT IA. It is therefore not at all surprising to see that these discussions are continuing and not terribly insightful to predict that they will continue.

What is less fortunate in this entire situation is that politicians’ attempts to initiate such discussions are frequently not channeled into a careful consideration of underlying issues involved, prompting much more long-term thinking and deeper analysis, but instead that the past two weeks clearly point to electoral positioning. Some of the people involved appear to be prioritizing personal political ambitions over national development goals which may OR MAY NOT best be served by attracting foreign investors to develop mineral deposits.

Musings that destabilize the investment climate and, possibly, Mongolia’s international positions for the sole benefit of possible electoral gain are certainly not a way to move a careful analysis of the issues facing Mongolia forward.

Other Immediate Implications

Perhaps the start and stop of re-negotiations cleared the air a little bit, but it’s hard not to think that the recent turmoil will have an impact on further negotiations regarding Tavan Tolgoi, the large coal project that the government wants to subcontract to international mining companies.

Posted in International Agreements, JD Mining Governance, Mining, Oyu Tolgoi, Politics, Research on Mongolia | Tagged | 1 Comment

Consensus on OT?

Mongolia’s President, Prime Minister, and Parliament Speaker want progress in OT, not delay.

Today, PM S. Batbold, Parliament Speaker D. Demberel and some members of parliament and cabinet members met with the President Ts. Elbegdorj to discuss current debates over the OT Agreement and the Election Law. President Ts. Elbegdorj backs the Government on OT. According to News.mn, the President stated that recent debates over OT Agreement need to stop, and Mongolia needs to exploit OT and get more investment as quickly as possible. Earlier this week at the opening of the Ikh Khural, the Speaker D. Demberel also urged progress in OT. During the meeting the PM S. Batbold said that the Government of Mongolia, Ivenhoe Mines and Rio Tinto are preparing a joint statement on OT. Tomorrow, PM S. Batbold will respond to the petition sent from 20 MPs last month.

Posted in Mining, Politics | Tagged | Leave a comment

No Stable Anti-Mining Coalition

By Julian Dierkes

Today, I published an Asia Pacific Memo that argued that no stable anti-mining coalition has coalesced in Mongolia to support or advance the recent petition asking the government to open negotiations with Oyu Tolgoi to increase the government ownership stake. Likewise, I don’t foresee a pro-mining party emerging any time soon.

Below, I offer an expanded version of this Memo:

Next week, German Chancellor Angela Merkel is scheduled to address the Mongolian parliament.  With this visit, Chancellor Merkel may hope to escape some of the turbulence of the current European debt crisis, but this visit will come in the middle of a mining policy tumult as Mongolian politicians are gearing up for a summer 2012 election. 20 MPs recently petitioned the government to re-visit an Investment Agreement signed with Ivanhoe Mines and Rio Tinto covering the giant Oyu Tolgoi project in 2009. This sent the shares of Ivanhoe and Mongolia’s credibility as a resource investment destination momentarily tumbling. Now, the speaker of the Mongolian parliament – who sets the legislative agenda – has lent his support to calls for a renegotiation of the Investment Agreement. Despite these voices, no enduring anti-mining coalition is behind this petition, nor has an anti-mining or pro-mining, single issue party emerged.

Mongolia has moved beyond the status of a “recent democracy” over twenty years after the gentle demise of state socialism through popular agitation. While Mongolian democracy has faced procedural and substantive changes, repeated peaceful changes of government and broad participation of the citizenry in politics  have established the rule of the people for the people firmly.

This puts Mongolia in noticeable contrast with the authoritarian post-Soviet republics of Central Asia where natural resources have also come to form the basis of economic development.

For the past five years and likely into the foreseeable future, Mongolian politics have revolved around the development of the Oyu Tolgoi copper and gold project in the South Gobi. When the mine goes into production (perhaps in 2013), it will dwarf all other single economic activities, contributing perhaps one third of GDP and will continue to do so even if the best-intentioned efforts at diversification succeed. The future of Mongolia’s GDP thus depends on this project to a great extend. However, many Mongolians also contend that the future of Gross National Happiness may depend on the participation – as owners – of the Mongolian people in this development project.

The negotiations between Ivanhoe Mines and the Mongolian government, later joined by Ivanhoe investor Rio Tinto, were a slow-moving roller coaster with numerous twists, turns, and dips largely created by the public musings of Mongolian politicians. Some of these musings led to a one-third ownership stake of the government in the Oyu Tolgoi project, bought with money borrowed from Ivanhoe Mines. While many had hoped that the conclusion of an agreement would lead to the stability favoured by international investors, the current turmoil has dashed these hopes.

But are current debates an indication of a long-term risk? Curiously no anti-mining party has emerged. Instead, individual politicians have created turmoil and continue to do so now. Noticeably these individual politicians are never members of the executive. While some politicians have railed against the Investment Agreement covering Oyu Tolgoi for years, they have not attempted to rally around this issue to form a single-issue party.

Of course, single-issue parties are not uncommon. Consider the Bloc Québécois in Canada or the anti-nuclear German Green Party of the early 1980s. So why no such single-issue grouping in Mongolia when the issue – Oyu Tolgoi – is arguably THE central issue facing Mongolians?

Two dynamics prevent the emergence of such a movement: 1. Corruption and patronage, and 2. The uncertainty about their opposition or support among even ardent proponents.

Mongolian politics revolve around patronage. That is politicians build their electoral strength relying on the positions and funding that they can offer to supporters once elected. Corruption can play an important role in shoring up such support by making greater financial means for such efforts available. Since patronage appointments are only available to members of the government or at least of parliament. There are thus significant incentives to individual politicians to be a member of a ruling coalition or of the government. These incentives have stabilized a grand coalition for some years, despite the Mongolian People’s Party’s majority of seats, by offering an incentive to Democratic Party officials to participate in a coalition.

Secondly, the strong populist ethic in Mongolian politics and especially its election campaigns has prevented politicians (and thus parties) to stake out strong substantive positions, lest they be identified to closely with this position and risk the wrath of the electorate should this position turn out to loose or fall out of favour. This has also stabilized the government coalition in that neither participating party wanted to risk being seen as the sole proponent of the OT Investment Agreement. While Mongolian politicians are commitment-shy on the Investment Agreement, they are not at all shy about sharing their musings on this issue very publicly, often via Twitter these days, with little regard to the state of mind of investors who interpret these musings to place Mongolia among investment-friendly and hostile economies.

Unless these underlying dynamics change – and the current turmoil if anything suggests that they will not leading up to next summer’s election – no stable anti-mining coalition, nor a forceful pro-mining grouping will emerge. If you are interested in following this story over coming years or, worse, if you are financially invested, buckle your seat belts! Mongolian politicians are going to continue to muse about the best way for the Mongolian people to participate in their mining boom and the options they will be considering will frequently be misidentified as resource nationalism.

P.S. (Feb 2013):
The absence of an anti-mining movement continues through 2012 and into 2013 despite simplistic cries of “resource nationalism” by foreign investors that are echoed by some writers. See:

Posted in Asia Pacific Memo, Democracy, International Agreements, JD Mining Governance, Mining, Oyu Tolgoi, Party Politics, Politics, Research on Mongolia | Tagged | 3 Comments